The Tom Thatch Modification

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hanleyclifford
    Afourian MVP
    • Mar 2010
    • 6994

    The Tom Thatch Modification

    This engineering idea has been rolling around in the brain for some time. Here is the change executed on my engine using a few items from the "possibles" bag. A more complete visual can be seen on my album.
    Last edited by hanleyclifford; 07-13-2016, 08:36 PM.
  • thatch
    Afourian MVP
    • Dec 2009
    • 1080

    #2
    "Wow"

    Hanley,
    I am flattered and humbled that you would tie this minor modification to me. I personally feel that the input from some seasoned pro's like you, N. Dutton, Dave Neptune, Latt 64 and many other contributors has done an imeasureable amount of good toward lengthening the life span of these unique engines. Shortly after buying an A4 powered sailboat a couple of years ago, and after doing some research, it became apparant that there was no suitable replacement engine (other than deisel) that would suit our needs nearly as well. I even went so far as to check things like "rod ratio" and "horsepower per cu.in." compared to other popular power plants, and soon realized why our little 30 H.P. gems were so prized. The patience and comradery displayed on this site is also a testament to the efforts by many toward the common goal of prolonging the legend of our "little beasties".
    Thank's, Tom
    P.S. Please forgive the ommision of mentioning the great photographic contributions by many and of course for the Moyer "family" for providing us with this gathering place.

    Comment

    • hanleyclifford
      Afourian MVP
      • Mar 2010
      • 6994

      #3
      For some of the original thinking on this idea go to the thread "another thought on coolant flow".

      Comment

      • lat 64
        Afourian MVP
        • Oct 2008
        • 1994

        #4
        Speaking of flattery

        I'm just a hack. My base is in car stuff. The product of a mis-spent youth.
        I'm really a new A-4 owner (10-2008). I have only one to show for my experience, but they have to run on the same physics—fire, air and Jurasic hi-test.
        Also it's kinda cold and dark up here so I post a lot. You see, I'm just too much of a loose canon to have a Facebook page. Now that'd be bad for everybody

        Keep thinkin' outside the box all,
        Russ
        sigpic Whiskeyjack a '68 Columbia 36 rebuilt A-4 with 2:1

        "Since when is napping doing nothing?"

        Comment

        • thatch
          Afourian MVP
          • Dec 2009
          • 1080

          #5
          "For what It's worth"

          Russ,
          I participate on one website, this one, because of the importance of the subject matter, (the A4) and because of the sincere, grass roots mentality of most of the participants. You're a perfect fit to the cause, so please don't underestimate your importance here.
          Sincerely, Tom

          Comment

          • Baltimore Sailor
            Afourian MVP
            • May 2007
            • 643

            #6
            I'm a bit confused. Could this mod be used on a raw water cooled engine as well? Or is it a design for FWC engines only?

            Comment

            • Dave Neptune
              Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
              • Jan 2007
              • 5050

              #7
              ?Dreamin'

              Hanley, did you run and shoot with the I/R gun and notice any additional cooling at the "U" spot? Tom same inquiry to you also.
              I have been wanting to turn mine around mostly because I check and clean out the manifold exit every year or two. It is just easier access at the front end.
              I'd really like to know if anyone has played with a differant cam profile. I can't help but think (a personl weakness) that since so many of us are using the A-4's power at a much lower RPM range than it is rated for that a differant cam for the direct drives may have a bit of an advantage. Or perhaps has anyone tried to advance the existing cam a bit?

              Dave Neptune

              Comment

              • hanleyclifford
                Afourian MVP
                • Mar 2010
                • 6994

                #8
                Originally posted by Baltimore Sailor View Post
                I'm a bit confused. Could this mod be used on a raw water cooled engine as well? Or is it a design for FWC engines only?
                I think Dave is still running raw water, and he is considering the modification.

                Comment

                • hanleyclifford
                  Afourian MVP
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 6994

                  #9
                  California Dreamin'

                  Dave - I love the way you west coast guys think. I guess you could advance the cam one tooth and see what happens. Or we could get Iskendarien to cook up (a re-grind?) something for us. I still dream about rollers on the mains and rods but I may be getting senile! Regards, Hanley

                  Comment

                  • Dave Neptune
                    Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 5050

                    #10
                    Teeth?

                    Baltimore, yes my A-4 is raw water cooled and going on it's 41st year.

                    Tom, I don't know how many teeth are on the A-4s cam drive assembly, actually can't remember. Going a whole tooth would be a bunch. Is either gear mounted ar are they all fixed? Perhaps Isky could regrind a stock cam to a lesser duration and have it open about 2~3 degrees sooner.

                    Over the years Isky has made a few custom cams for me and they worked great. There is a lot of knowledge in their shop to draw on. I still like the idea of a roller cam on a flathead. I know a few who have redone their 32 roadsters and pulled the SSB Chevy's out and put back in the flatheads with roller cams. Yes they did sacrafice a bit of power compared with the SSB Chevy but they lost a lot of weight in the total drive line~~ie smaller trans and rear ends. They look awesome with the Strombergs and polished Copper heads.

                    Dave Neptune

                    Comment

                    • ILikeRust
                      Afourian MVP
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 2212

                      #11
                      For those of us just tuning in and having not a clue what the hell you guys are on about - could you expand a bit as to what the mod is and why it's a good thing?

                      And while you're at it, type slowly and use small words for us slow types.
                      - Bill T.
                      - Richmond, VA

                      Relentless pursuer of lost causes

                      Comment

                      • Baltimore Sailor
                        Afourian MVP
                        • May 2007
                        • 643

                        #12
                        Let me see if I can explain it right, so that I'll know if I have a grip on the concept.

                        Rather than take the outlet from the thermostat to the forward (next to the thermostat) inlet on the manifold, you run the line down to the aft fitting, then run an outlet from the forward fitting to the injection point. The thinking behind this mod is that the vast majority of A4s tilt toward the aft, so that cooling water introduced at the forward inlet just runs "downhill" to the aft inlet. By introducing the coolant at the rear of the manifold it's forced to fill "uphill" before it can exit to the muffler.

                        Is that right?

                        Comment

                        • hanleyclifford
                          Afourian MVP
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 6994

                          #13
                          Exactly right.

                          Comment

                          • hanleyclifford
                            Afourian MVP
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 6994

                            #14
                            I made an hour long test run today with the TTM in place and discovered something unexpected. Even though I have been FWC for many years and recently did a thorough cleaning of the manifold including removal of both freeze/expansion plugs, I noticed a significant amount of crud in the strainer as soon as I started up. The strainer had been almost clear. FWIW.

                            Comment

                            • sastanley
                              Afourian MVP
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 7030

                              #15
                              Tom , there was a Kaminsky modification a while back that I think is now standard practice on the reversing gears from Moyer...why not have a modification to the cooling system called the "Thatch cooling modification" if it proves effective!?!?!

                              I just pulled some of my cooling lines today (still RWC for the moment) and the aft manifold area was nasty and clogged...even if you stay RWC, having this 'flushing' forward and not resting and settling in the aft end of the manifold seems an improvement to me.

                              It is backyard innovators bucking the standards that keep these motors running.

                              (psst. Lat64, I am only at Lat 38 and I don't have a Facebook either..it is a social engineering scam!!!!)
                              Last edited by sastanley; 02-28-2011, 09:27 PM. Reason: Oops..fixing Tom's name.. :o
                              -Shawn
                              "Holiday" - '89 Alura 35 #109
                              "Twice Around" - '77 C-30, #511 with original A-4 & MMI manifold - SOLD! (no longer a two boat owner!!)
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X