Thinking about what Bill wrote in post #2 above, perhaps we could come up with a set of design criteria specific to the installation of Atomic 4s into sailboats. If half the fleet is affected such a "check list" would be useful. Maybe we could start with some easy non-contoversial ones: 1) The system should maximize resistance to intrusion of a following sea. 2) The system should minimize unproductive work load on the engine. Who's got #3?
no more fouled plugs
Collapse
X
-
Sorry about the dead link. Howze dis?Attached FilesNeil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
Got it! Thanks Neil.
Any atomic-4 specific design info or equipment would be on my "next purchase" list. Any of you engineer/entrepreneur types out there are greatly appreciated. This back pressure issue sounds as if it's been around for a while. It would be great if someone could come up with the definitive solution.
Comment
-
-
Neil - That link does indeed provide a solid framework for our discussion in ths forum. However, I would add that the suggested dimensions are quite unrealistic for most of us. In addition we must also consider the issue of performance in light of our limited horsepower. The system as configured in "Figure 4" would choke most Atomic 4s. That said, I have to agree that it is useful and cautionary. Regards, Hanley
Comment
-
-
The link was intended as conceptual, a reasonable description of the waterlift system. The dimensions provided just happened to be there, weren't my doing. More often than not the dimensions are dictated by the limitations of our personal boat and the mid-engine Catalina 30 is the poster child for exhaust system limitations.
Wish I could find a standpipe system drawing for comparison.Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
Sorry Neil, I did not mean to suggest those were your numbers. The link is a good discussion because it makes us focus on the details. Before I joined this forum I thought I had the best exhaust system in the fleet; now the more I hear and read, the more uncertain I get. I really like those long jacketed copper or bronze systems because they are so direct and eliminate the injection and lift issues. But they sure look expensive.
Comment
-
-
I put something together that might help. After opening, scroll down to see both pages. Sorry for the fuzzy drawings.Attached FilesNeil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
Neil - Those drawings clearly demonstrate the conceptual superiority of the standpipe from the efficiency viewpoint - no use of engine energy to drive water uphill or issue with water getting to the manifold (which I believe is what originally motivated this thread). However, it's dimensional requirements are daunting for most of us. But I would do it if I could. The water lift concept is clearly inferior. I think for most of us the solution lies in creating the best possible water lift system our dimensions allow unless we can spring for the long jacket such as the ones Russ and 67 and Kelly use. I did a little checking on copper and bronze pricing - my materials cost for even a two foot jacket would exceed $300. Laker - I'm going to leave it to others to render that definition. I can only describe it as the process we observe when water comes out the transom unevenly because the pressure varies in the wet system. When I pressure tested at the hot section I observed variation between 0 and 1psi.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Laker View PostPlease define and describe "Batching".
Originally posted by hanleyclifford View PostNeil - Those drawings clearly demonstrate the conceptual superiority of the standpipe from the efficiency viewpoint - no use of engine energy to drive water uphill or issue with water getting to the manifold (which I believe is what originally motivated this thread). However, it's dimensional requirements are daunting for most of us.
Somewhat off topic, it raises an interesting thought. In addition to Moyer Marine, what specialty vendors/fabricators (other than West Marine) do y'all keep handy to support your boating addiction? For me with my background, I do much of my fabrication myself but I still have two stainless fabricators, sailmaker, rigger, canvas shop, dedicated fiberglass supplier, teak supplier, an excellent stainless fastener supplier, bottom cleaner and in conjunction with a major project described on two other forums, a stainless foundry to make custom castings.Last edited by ndutton; 10-11-2010, 10:10 AM.Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
-Shawn
"Holiday" - '89 Alura 35 #109
"Twice Around" - '77 C-30, #511 with original A-4 & MMI manifold - SOLD! (no longer a two boat owner!!)
sigpic
Comment
-
-
"I need to find me a good teak supplier"
Consider using a South American hardwood called "pao lope" , "epae" (sp?) pronounced eepay , sometimes sold as hardwood decking. I have used it in a number of marine applications. It is as hard or harder than teak , has much the same appearance , holds a finish beautifully , and costs a heck of a lot less. Everyone in my marina thinks that the huge swim platform on my powerboat is teak.
Sorry for going off topic.
Laker1966 Columbia 34 SABINA
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Laker View PostPlease define and describe "Batching".1974 C&C 27
Comment
-
Comment