67, I agree there...the weight listed for an A-4 like mine is 310 lbs...I'd pull the starter, water pump, carb, fuel pump, maybe even manifold..that should lighten her up quite a bit. 5 lbs here and 5 lbs there..straps underneath would also be most desirable given the past discussion on this forum of the lifting eye possibly causing cracks.
Hoisting the engine
Collapse
X
-
You may wish to check this out: Pictures of Lever Used to Remove A-4}
Something like this will make it a lot easier to get the motor out from under the companion way steps.
Here is a video showing an A-4 being removed using only the existing rigging. I personally would use a come-along or chain-fall at the end of the halyard:
Removing A-4 part 1
Removing A-4 part 2
The set up Art mentions would take less time than just arranging for the crane and would be way cheaper. The money you save would pay for some nice upgrades. Jim's A-4 Rig to Remove the A-4Mike
Comment
-
-
Regarding the link to using a lever
I didn't fully see how the lever was used from the pictures, but
it appears that the lever is attached to the lifting ring at a 90 degree
angle, putting it in sheer which would extremely stress the lifting ring
and head.
Regards
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Laker View PostI would like to know more about the potential perils of lifting by the ring. I thought that is what it is for.
My experience goes the other way. I've probably installed over a hundred A4's using the factory lifting eye without a single issue to my knowledge.
Given that the engines I lifted were new, I wonder if age, corrosion, etc. is a factor. Perhaps with an older engine the force placed from the lifting eye is the straw that broke the camel's back.Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ndutton View PostThere has been considerable discussion about the lifting eye/bracket imparting loads on the head that result in cracks.
I'll certainly discuss all this with the yard before hoisting my engine out. I've decided to just pay them to bring their crane over - I'll have everything ready to go, so it shouldn't take more than a few minutes (hopefully). I do like the idea of lifting it with several straps all the way around and under the engine, rather than dangling it from just two head studs.
I've already taken off the manifold (which includes the carb) and will also remove the alternator and coil.- Bill T.
- Richmond, VA
Relentless pursuer of lost causes
Comment
-
-
Don't quote me but as best I recall the lift point of the eye places a torque load onto the head surface as opposed to a dead lift on the studs. This force would change as weighty engine components are removed. The cracks mentioned were in the head in the vicinity of the stud holes where the lifting eye is mounted.Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
"Both"
Lifters,
Universal placed the lifting ring in that particular place because it is about the best balance point, (Neil can probably verify this). Having said that, if for some reason, even if it's just a confidence booster, you would feel better with more support, just add a decent quality ratchet strap around the oil pan and connect both ends to the lifting hook. Only snug it up enough to ease a little of the load and if the unthinkable happens (ring or stud failure) then the strap will absorb the weight.
Tom
Comment
-
-
A quick search of the archive turned up this. There's more to be found though.
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ndutton View PostDon't quote me but as best I recall the lift point of the eye places a torque load onto the head surface as opposed to a dead lift on the studs.- Bill T.
- Richmond, VA
Relentless pursuer of lost causes
Comment
-
-
Based on the photos I've seen, it also seems to me that there were a couple different designs of lifting "eyes". On mine, it's not really a lifting eye so much as an alternator mounting bracket. That is, there is not separate ring for lifting - it's just a folded steel bracket with two "ears" bent up, each with a hole through it, for the alternator mounting bolt to go through. The only way to use it as a lifting eye is to remove the alternator to open up those holes.
Also, mine is held on with only two studs. I've seen others that are larger and held on with four. I'm pondering the possibility of fabricating a new one, using the same thickness steel, but that goes across the head and engages two more studs, so it would distribute the lifting load across four studs instead of just those two.
But again, maybe it would just be simpler to use straps going under the engine and avoid the whole lifting eye issue.
Ain't it interesting how we all over analyze this stuff to death?- Bill T.
- Richmond, VA
Relentless pursuer of lost causes
Comment
-
-
'On second thought"
Neil,
Very interesting thread. After looking at the Moyer panoramic view engine(top angle) it would appear that there is considerable side leverage placed on the 2 studs used for the lifting ring. It also looks like it would be a relatively easy project to add a small angle iron bracket bolted to side of the ring to pick up the next stud toward the transmission end of the engine.
Comment
-
Comment