#51
IP: 107.0.6.242
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#52
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Oooh, that's a spicy meatball
Gotta be careful where it's mounted, that baby gets HOT!!
I'm thinking of a simple angle bracket that fastens to the coil mounting bolt on the back of the engine. After successful testing I might fashion a heat shield for the coil to protect it from the exhaust (been talking off-list with thatch on that one) and incorporate the resistor into it.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others |
#53
IP: 208.89.140.11
|
|||
|
|||
This is going to get hot, I'm thinking of moving it away from the engine and a L brkt would work best.
I did see where there's a faston for 14 awg and thats the one I will use I did send an email to Pertronix asking minimum current needed to create the spark. I haven't seen a response yet. Steve |
#54
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Steve,
I think the minimum is directly affected by plug gap and the resistance of the plug wires and both vary boat to boat. A 0.035" plug gap will require more energy to arc than a 0.030" gap. Therefore I'm not sure Pertronix can provide a definitive number given the possible variables.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others |
#55
IP: 208.89.140.11
|
|||
|
|||
Neil, thats makes sense,
ok so I'll try the .8 ohm you found at Napa Steve |
#56
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Great Steve,
I hope it works but what I really like best is the variety of members involved. The post engagement debriefings should provide excellent information either way.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others |
#57
IP: 199.254.67.146
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#58
IP: 151.200.21.32
|
||||
|
||||
Neil, your resistor looks the same as mine, however, I am running the 1.2 ohm version, which really measures at 1.6 if I recall.
part # ECH ICR23 - keep in mind I have this 'mated' to a 1.5 ohm coil at present.
__________________
-Shawn "Twice Around" - '77 Catalina 30, #511 with original A-4 & MMI manifold - for sale - PM me if interested "Holiday" - '89 Alura 35 #109 (uh oh, two boat owner!!) ![]() |
#59
IP: 174.65.54.224
|
||||
|
||||
Neil, do you have a voltage drop per foot equation? Or does it also depend on the wire gauge?
What I'm thinking is, in an emergency, adding lengths of wire to the + coil input should result in lower voltage. Yep, another hair brained idea from Jim....but, could it work?
__________________
"Jim" S/V "Ahoi" 1967 Islander 29 Harbor Island, San Diego 2/7/67 A4 Engine Block date |
#60
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Voltage drop is a function of voltage, amperage, wire gauge (cross sectional area), wire material and length. If it seems like a complicated formula, it is.
Instead there are several calculators available. The one I like for our needs is found here in the left column. edit: Please save me a trip to the boat for a simple answer to a simple question. What size are the 2 bolts that mount the coil bracket to the rear of the engine block? 1/4" or 5/16" if I remember.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others Last edited by ndutton; 09-27-2011 at 08:56 PM. |
#61
IP: 193.253.220.149
|
||||
|
||||
While waiting for news on my "French Resistance", here's a nasty little joke:
How many French soldiers does it take to defend France? Response: We don't know, they've never tried. (Ouch!) WARNING: Verify the nationality of everyone in the room before you tell this joke. ![]()
__________________
Kelly 1964 Cheoy Lee Bermuda Ketch, Wind and Atomic powered ![]() |
#62
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
I amuse myself
Quote:
Ha, current calculation! Allow an old guy life's simple pleasures.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others Last edited by ndutton; 11-06-2014 at 10:33 AM. Reason: Technical correction |
#63
IP: 206.125.176.3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Neil, yes..I am aware of that..back on page 2 I think..Napa has a pretty good selection in that line of resistors, from less than 1 ohm, up to it seems like 1.82 is the highest, so I should be able to find one. My current
![]() Quote:
It has been raining here for something like 25 days. My wife and I saw the boat briefly last Wednesday evening for a light cleaning event with the intent to use it & go sailing this past weekend. Guess what..it rained..& we bailed on our plans and never made it to the boat. We had thunderstorms at 0700 today. The weather's inability to cooperate with me is becoming exceedingly frustrating. ![]()
__________________
-Shawn "Twice Around" - '77 Catalina 30, #511 with original A-4 & MMI manifold - for sale - PM me if interested "Holiday" - '89 Alura 35 #109 (uh oh, two boat owner!!) ![]() Last edited by sastanley; 09-28-2011 at 11:10 AM. Reason: found my earlier post |
#64
IP: 148.170.241.1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But don't let me impede or resist your attempts at humor. In fact, I would find it shocking if someone didn't try to make a few bad puns here. I mean, watts the point if we can't joke around a little bit? Maybe someone will get a charge out of it. After all, it's better not to be negative and instead be positive. In fact, I tend to be a terminal punster myself. But some people just don't have the capacity for it.
__________________
- Bill T. - Richmond, VA Relentless pursuer of lost causes |
#65
IP: 193.253.220.149
|
||||
|
||||
Tour de force!!
__________________
Kelly 1964 Cheoy Lee Bermuda Ketch, Wind and Atomic powered ![]() |
#66
IP: 199.173.226.236
|
||||
|
||||
4 thoughts:
I could build a current limiter that would hold the coil to 3 amps as voltage varies up and down Millions of engines get by without anything like this I never had one coil issue until I got electronic ignition. The score - pre electronic: 1 coil after about 15 years Electronic: At least one per year if not more Post electronic: None so far I wonder if coils were better back in the day? |
#67
IP: 75.68.130.228
|
|||
|
|||
Wouldn't the ballast resistor be more reliable than a current limit circuit ?
Steve |
#68
IP: 151.200.21.32
|
||||
|
||||
Ok...I have a little more updated information.
I tried the voltage check at rest with the jumper. 10.7 volts on the battery side of the resistor. 5.72 volts on the coil (+) with the ignition switch on, engine not running. Incidentally, the brand new Pertronix coil at rest also = 3.3ohms..just like the bad one.
__________________
-Shawn "Twice Around" - '77 Catalina 30, #511 with original A-4 & MMI manifold - for sale - PM me if interested "Holiday" - '89 Alura 35 #109 (uh oh, two boat owner!!) ![]() |
#69
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Incomplete data because I have CRS syndrome
Got the ballast resistor installed today and took some coil temperature measurements. This report is incomplete because I forgot to take my voltage tester and camera.
I think I'll post a complete report on a new thread at a later time but for now here's what I can tell you: I made 2 independent sets of temperature measurements 2 weeks apart. One set was with the original ignition set-up - Pertronix EI and their #40511 Flamethrower coil. Measurements were made from a dead cold start and targeted the Flamethrower label on the coil. RPM was 1200 to bring the alternator into play. The second set of temps were measured exactly the same except with a ballast resistor installed. The resistor was the only difference. Without resistor the coil temp achieved 162 degrees in 30 minutes. With resistor - 133 degrees in 30 minutes. I don't know if either temp maxed out in 30 minutes although the with-resistor temps were rising at a lower rate than the no-resistor by a factor of 1:4 at the 30 minute mark. That may imply the with-resistor temps were approaching max while the no-resistor temps were not. More measurements with longer run times will tell us more. And finally, there was a thought that the resistor and resultant lower coil voltage may have a negative effect on starting. That was not my experience. My engine fired up in it's normal 1/2 second crank, no noticeable difference at all.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others Last edited by ndutton; 09-28-2011 at 10:48 PM. |
#70
IP: 75.68.130.228
|
|||
|
|||
Neil, Good data, where did you mount the resistor ? and where is the coil mounted.
I ordered the same resistor at Napa and plan on installing this we. Steve |
#71
IP: 193.253.220.149
|
||||
|
||||
Neil,
Thank you for being so thorough and rapid in reporting your test results. Do your results confirm your suspicions fully or were you thinking there would be more/less difference in the temperature measurements once the resistor was in the circuit? I'm holding my breath until you're able to report back with results of Volts at the coil+ after the resistor was installed. I'd like to compare with you and Shawn concerning: Volts with ignition on, engine not running; Volts with the engine running at idle and cruising RPM. And for personal puzzlement, what do you get at the coil+ with everything turned off (power supplied to the ignition switch but the switch turned off)? TIA
__________________
Kelly 1964 Cheoy Lee Bermuda Ketch, Wind and Atomic powered ![]() |
#72
IP: 24.152.131.220
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I want to repeat that I see this resistor business as a remedy for inadequate coils in terms of internal resistance. Get the right coil and the resistor is not needed, simple as that. Quote:
I veered from my original theory and testing when I clumsily stumbled upon an obscure Pertronix advisory about the 4 amp system maximum. I had no expectations, just followed where the information lead me with the goal of lower coil temps in mind. Looks like we're there. My original theory which I still may test at some point was whether or not a greater, more complete discharge of the coil would reduce the operating temperature. The tests would have been with increased plug gap, like 0.050" instead of 0.035". As stated earlier, that would require more energy to arc the gap. I was curious what effect it would have on coil temperature, if any. Think I'll save that exercise for a rainy day. It's kind of funny that our tired old electrical wiring with poor or corroded connections everywhere and the resultant voltage drop is nirvana for our coils. Shawn cleaned up his wiring improving the voltage so much he poofed the coil that had run beautifully with the old funky wiring.
__________________
Neil 1977 Catalina 30 San Pedro, California prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22 Had my hands in a few others Last edited by ndutton; 11-06-2014 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Technical correction |
The Following User Says Thank You to ndutton For This Useful Post: | ||
holyhumor (09-18-2018) |
#73
IP: 107.0.6.243
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil - Your research seems to reinforce the wisdom learned from the sixties when we were building "street" machines and dropping our money into a different kind of "hole". In those days the ignition "horsepower" race was on among the aftermarket suppliers, Accel and Mallory come to mind. The theory was that more was better - 50,000 volts from the Mallory RevPol system I used on a 426 wedge with 13.5:1 compression. But that was another era and now we have 6:1 compresion and just flat don't need that level of ignition. This is the punch line that your research is now quantifying - there is no point in elevating ignition voltage above that which will ignite the mixture. It follows that we can afford to lower voltage at coil+ to the minimum that will fire the mixture. Knowing that cranking reduces effective voltage at coil+ the OEM guys developed the "override" that we run from solenoid "R". FWIW I have been using the same points and coil for 1000 hrs by constantly supervising the points with a dwell meter,not a feeler gauge. As far as I can see the only real advantage to electronic ignition is the low maintenance feature.
Last edited by hanleyclifford; 09-29-2011 at 09:33 AM. |
#74
IP: 193.253.220.149
|
||||
|
||||
Call me the cobbler. I just found two resistors @ 0.22ohms each. Wired in series I should reach the holy grail of 3.75amps at the coil+
I'll report back with actual measurements after testing... Hanley- can you elaborate on the Quote:
__________________
Kelly 1964 Cheoy Lee Bermuda Ketch, Wind and Atomic powered ![]() |
#75
IP: 173.166.26.241
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kelly - Sometimes, especially in cold weather, engines can have trouble starting because cranking voltage can be as low as 9 or 10 volts. If ignition voltage is being further reduced by resistors ahead of the coil it is possible that insufficient voltage will be available to fire the coil. The remedy? Bypass the coil resistor during the cranking cycle by running a wire from solenoid "R" which is activated only when cranking. Once the key (or button) is released "R" goes dead and the coil must draw thru the resistors.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some Comments About Coils | Don Moyer | Ignition System | 42 | 10-17-2017 05:03 PM |
Hot Coil and High Alternator Output | Triton106 | Electrical | 53 | 10-02-2011 07:12 PM |
engine stops | Possum | Troubleshooting | 4 | 04-20-2011 09:19 AM |
Information about information and oil pressure issues | Don Moyer | Announcements | 0 | 04-14-2009 08:30 AM |
Hi, new member with a problem | cpdeeley | Introductions | 10 | 01-11-2009 01:43 PM |