View Single Post
  #19   IP: 107.0.6.150
Old 07-05-2016, 12:14 PM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,987
Thanks: 176
Thanked 285 Times in 228 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyPlanet169 View Post
Respectfully, I disagree. IMO, it is perfectly good engineering in having a large, protected wire to coil +, and then short branch circuits from there.

There are a several loads in close physical proximity to coil + that are only normally energized from IGN on the starter key switch. Coil, E.I., fuel pump, alternator excite.

I actually installed a small terminal block next to my coil yesterday for exactly this reason. Too many terminals to hang off the coil+ !
Undoubtedly you can get away with that but you should know the potential for voltage variations is greater than if you had separate circuits. The question then becomes: what is the problem with voltage variations at coil +?
Reply With Quote