Return to the home page...

Go Back   Moyer Marine Atomic 4 Community - Home of the Afourians > Discussion Topics > Drive Train / Propellers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   IP: 71.90.49.175
Old 11-01-2010, 10:14 AM
Laker Laker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sheboygan wis.
Posts: 454
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Atomic Four Prop

Anyone have experience with this prop ? I like the theory , but it almost sounds too good to be true.
http://mysite.verizon.net/resqp86c/p...lers/id21.html
Reply With Quote
  #2   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-01-2010, 11:31 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I have had a Indigo propeller for over 12 seasons with no problems.
Many people on this site have one and swear by it.

The propeller you mention sounds very similar to the one that
that cruising design had out. They mention that they are prone to shedding
propeller blades. I believe they are made of plastic. They also state
that you can hobble home with one blade. Personally, I would rather
have a prop that never sheds its blades. I always keep a zinc on
the prop and like the thrust that it provides when you really need it
in a nasty chop

Regards

Art
Reply With Quote
  #3   IP: 71.118.13.238
Old 11-01-2010, 03:08 PM
Dave Neptune Dave Neptune is offline
Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grove, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,035
Thanks: 711
Thanked 1,289 Times in 839 Posts
Thumbs up Prop

Laker, you ah Laker fan?
Yes I have had exoerience on 3 boats with them ande they work fine.
The down side of the break-away blades is that they aren't quite as strong as the bronze and they work fine.
The up side is that if you hit something hard with your prop you will unlikely bend the shaft or damage the transmission.
The neutral side is that with either one you will have a vibration issue if you strike something hard enough to part with a blade. Your call!!!

Personally I love my Indigo and won't go back to a 2 blade of any sort because of my boats performance characteristics in reverse.

Dave Neptune
Reply With Quote
  #4   IP: 71.90.49.175
Old 11-01-2010, 05:54 PM
Laker Laker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sheboygan wis.
Posts: 454
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Negative re Laker fan , not too much on basketball. I follow Packers football & golf.

So , the plastic blades are designed to break away on impact? It seems to me that impact chances are minimal given the configuration of sailboat hulls , especially if the prop shaft exits the trailing edge of the keel.

What caught my interest was the variable pitch characteristics , if that concept works as advertised.

Currently I am running a 13x8 Martec feathering prop. I took a chance on it a while back because it was well priced , but it is clearly too much wheel for my boat ; the engine is unable to wind out and I am doing nearly 3 knots at idle. I am considering a 12x8 2 blade fixed prop - very affordable , and I figure it HAS to outperform the Martec in reverse. I would be just as well off working over the side with a paddle as I am putting on the brakes with the Martec. My engine compartment would make it fairly easy to center the prop as to trail it in the shadow of the keel.

Comments welcome ,

Laker
Reply With Quote
  #5   IP: 69.226.123.248
Old 11-01-2010, 07:27 PM
dvd's Avatar
dvd dvd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Joaquin Delta, California
Posts: 449
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Laker,

Its too bad that you dont have the correct sized martec folder as they work very well. Since they fold up when sailing they allow much less drag but do great when motoring. I just took my 30 foot Cal 3-30 on a 150+ mile cruise in all types of conditions and it performed excellent both while motoring and sailing. Before you purchase one of those break away props I would call Martec and just chat with them over the phone. It may be possible to re do your existing prop. My boat has a 2 to 1 drive and calls for a 16'' 10 pitch prop.

DVD
Reply With Quote
  #6   IP: 70.22.226.86
Old 11-01-2010, 08:51 PM
Mark S's Avatar
Mark S Mark S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marblehead MA
Posts: 421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Laker,

I second what Dave Neptune said.

I had a 13x8 two blade but I couldn't get above 1500 RPM. I switched last spring to an Indigo 3 blade which improved RPM to 1900 with slight sacrifice in top end speed, maybe .2 knots or so. I had thought about that Performance Prop but ultimately decided on the Indigo as more people on this site have it. I'm still not happy with the RPM, but I think my boat is at the limit of what an A4 can push.

Mark S
Reply With Quote
  #7   IP: 71.90.49.175
Old 11-02-2010, 07:45 AM
Laker Laker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sheboygan wis.
Posts: 454
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
DVD - Having my Martec machined is an interesting proposition. I will look into that. However , even if that is possible , it would not address my poor ability to put on the brakes ; in fact it might make that factor worse as the blade shapes would remain the same but for reduced area.

I am thinking that the shape which allows the Martec blades to conform when folded is what compromises reverse thrust ... comments?

When I first aquired the Columbia 34 it carried a conventional 3 blade prop. I remember motoring out on a calm day to get to know my new boat ,(which seemed like an enormous ship) , and being rather pleased with the backing characteristics. I could sometimes back up into s-turns and circles if I "got ahead of the boat" with the rudder. Now I apply reverse , wait to see what happens , and react accordingly.
When it comes to stopping , well , I already made the paddle reference...

Mark S - your boat model and displacement is ? The Indigo design makes sense in terms of performance under power. It may be silly , given the big old barge I pilot , but I am still reluctant to drag a 3 blade prop while under sail. Anyone have any solid info on the drag generated by a fixed 3 blade vs a fixed 2 blade which is centered in line with the keel at rest?

Finally , is it reasonable for me to predict the a fixed 2 blade will out perform my Martec in reverse ? ( To keep this in perspective , if my Martec was compatible with my A-4 I would be inclined to continue to cope with the poor reverse performance. Since I need to make a change , I am sorting through the options...)

Laker
Reply With Quote
  #8   IP: 24.136.77.31
Old 11-02-2010, 08:09 AM
Dave Neptune Dave Neptune is offline
Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grove, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,035
Thanks: 711
Thanked 1,289 Times in 839 Posts
Lightbulb Reverse!

Laker, FYI reverse in these direct drive A-4's can be a bit problimatic due to the way it operates. There is actually a reduction from 1:1 in reverse it is something like 1.3:1 so YOU the operator need to rev her up quite a bit more for two reasons. One you need to spin the prop faster as they (any prop) are less efficient in reverse and the trans is "naturally" much noisier~~no problem! Two you have a bit more rpm's and power available due to the reduction and there is no locking into reverse as there is in forward (the detent), so you should hold the shifter to keep the band tight and limit the slippage. Learning this made a difference for me!
The three blade works better in reverse and is the biggest reason I went to the Indigo as I have a mooring on Catalina Island and it sits next to rocks and a kelp bed so when I need to manuver I need to manuver. The Indigo is suprisingly small and the blades are a bit narrow, it has less drag than the 2 blade I removed and works far better in forward. It also will almost completely eleviate the rudder wobble caused by the 2 blade as well. It made a huge improvement on my ole E-35MkII.

Dave Neptune
Reply With Quote
  #9   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-02-2010, 08:12 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
Check out the comments that Tom Stevens has assembled on his
website atomic4.com regarding comparison of 3 and 2 blade props.

Regards

Art
Reply With Quote
  #10   IP: 75.67.88.37
Old 11-02-2010, 07:05 PM
wlevin wlevin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This topic seems to come up as often as overheating issues. I suppose it is because prop type and sizing is critical to getting performance out of our engines, especially when they are near the top of their capacity to push a boat, such as a 35 foot, deep keel cruising sailboat. The wrong prop can be a disaster. Low revs and nothing in reserve in a headwind being the worst consequences.
We have used both the Indigo 3 blade and the plastic CDI prop you asked about on our Tartan 34 and like both. I think the performance is quite close between the two, with the Indigo getting the nod for better performance in reverse. However, the CDI is on our boat and the Indigo is the backup because we sail so much more than we motor, and I find the CDI has less drag because we can line it up with the deadwood and sail with less drag.
That's all.
Bill and Jeanne
T34C #453
Otter
Reply With Quote
  #11   IP: 70.22.226.86
Old 11-02-2010, 10:05 PM
Mark S's Avatar
Mark S Mark S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marblehead MA
Posts: 421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Following is a picture of our new Indigo on our new shaft at the beginning of the sailing season and two pictures of the same today after hauling out. We did not use a zinc due to yard reasons not pertinent here. We moor out in the harbor, not in a slip. I examined the propeller and shaft closely since hauling out and I see no evidence of adverse galvanic action. Nevertheless, I will use a zinc nut next season.

Mark
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #12   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 06:27 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I have a stainless steel Indigo prop on a bronze shaft on my Tartan 34C.
I have always used a sacrificial zinc, but am curious what the result would
be if I went zinc less.

Regards

Art
Reply With Quote
  #13   IP: 71.90.49.175
Old 11-03-2010, 07:39 AM
Laker Laker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sheboygan wis.
Posts: 454
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
How important is/are the use of zinc(s) in fresh water? I have none , and have observed no problems. However , I have seen sacrificials on a lot of boats hereabouts.

Laker
Reply With Quote
  #14   IP: 173.166.26.241
Old 11-03-2010, 09:50 AM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
Regarding the use of zincs in fresh water, I have done some crude testing which indicates that although in theory fresh water (pure H20) is not an electrolyte, and thus will not support a galvanic cell, in practice all environments in which boats travel have some conductive ions which support a cell. However, the effect is greatly reduced and if I were in "fresh" water I would run with no zinc and make continuous observations. The advantages of running with no zinc include greatly reduced attraction of barnacles. Since Art has a stainless prop on bronze shaft he should stick with the zincs in salt water. But why not go with a stainless shaft for the real Cadillac set up?
Reply With Quote
  #15   IP: 67.90.51.162
Old 11-03-2010, 10:12 AM
ghaegele's Avatar
ghaegele ghaegele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I have the Indigo on my C&C 35. I feel that I am at the end range of power for my boat. When powering into a stiff wind and significant sea my engine can barely push the boat--2 - 3 knots. In calm seas I get almost 6 kts at 2000 RPM. Any thoughts on whether a larger prop might get me more drive in wind and sea?
Reply With Quote
  #16   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 10:16 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
My Tartan 34c is 34.5 feet and 11,500 lbs . The Indigo is able to push
the boat at least 5 knots in a nasty chop when running rpm at
2200 to 2400 rpm.

What rpm are you able to achieve? Maybe the distributor may need
to be turned. Is the bottom clean?
Reply With Quote
  #17   IP: 67.90.51.162
Old 11-03-2010, 10:56 AM
ghaegele's Avatar
ghaegele ghaegele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I've tuned the distributor to maximum RPM at cruising speed and can get about 2200 max. The boat gets hauled every year and the bottom never gets very bad. I like the Indigo but sometimes feel like I got better drive from a larger diameter two-blade that I had on years ago. But that could just be a selective memory.

Art, I'd say your Tartan is close in specs to my C&C. (Actually, I have 35.5 feet and 13,800 displacement. But that's not a huge difference) Five knots in a chop, maybe. But not in wind and sea. I sail in the LI Sound where we often get more than a chop. I might be expecting too much from my engine, but I feel like going to power is just not an option when I am heading into significant wind and sea.

Last edited by ghaegele; 11-03-2010 at 10:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 11:11 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I just took a look at the Michigan propeller that was on the Tartan when
I bought it I believe it was a 12 X9 . I was able to get 6 knots
in calm seas at 1700 rpm. But the boat would lug in a steep short chop.
and only do around 3 knots.
I changed both pitch and diameter, reducing both. The current diameter
is around 10 inches. It made little difference in rpm.

I then went to the Indigo.

I have sailed Buzzards bay often, including Long Island sound.
Even in rough seas off woods hole I could do 5 knots with the Indigo.

If you are talking about heading into significant seas with a lot of current
against you, you may be losing headway due to current. There is always
some conditions which will try any combination.

Tom Stevens experimented with the propeller on his Tartan 34C
and found the best thrust combination was with the current design.
I know that he has made some minor improvements to the prop.
You might want to check with him at Indigo and see if your prop
has the latest "twists". Tom upgraded my prop at no charge.
I doubt that this would solve your issue. I think you should
speak to Tom Stevens because a larger diameter prop will give
you less thrust, not more.

Regards,

Art
Reply With Quote
  #19   IP: 67.90.51.162
Old 11-03-2010, 11:50 AM
ghaegele's Avatar
ghaegele ghaegele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
My prop is probably more than 10 years old. I think I will give Indigo a call and see if he has any suggestions. (And no, Art, I'm not talking about heading into current. That's silly.)
Reply With Quote
  #20   IP: 70.91.138.225
Old 11-03-2010, 03:05 PM
Mark S's Avatar
Mark S Mark S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marblehead MA
Posts: 421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Art,

Do you have direct drive or reduced drive? My boat is 35 feet and weighs 13,000 lbs. and I can't get above 1900 rpm with a direct driven Indigo. With the previous 13x8 I couldn't get above 1500 rpm. I'm beginning to think that the direct drive A4 is simply not strong enough to push boats this size.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #21   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 03:17 PM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I have a direct drive. If your engine is in reasonable shape the
timing can be set to produce 2400, or close as possible.
Note it must be set
at the rpm you desire in order to achieve the max or near max rpm.
This is set by running your boat flat out open in forward, or as close as possible and then turning the distributor for max rpm.
You may wish a compromise between flat out and your usual cruise
speed rpm.
Reply With Quote
  #22   IP: 67.90.51.162
Old 11-03-2010, 03:27 PM
ghaegele's Avatar
ghaegele ghaegele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I agree that we're underpowered. I set it at my cruising speed, which is just about 2100 RPM. I rebuilt my engine (direct drive also) two years ago and have under 100 hrs on it. Still I don't get much beyond 2200 RMP. (Perhaps its still breaking in?) I have played with the timing and don't think that I'm going to get much more RPM by adjusting it at full-out.
Reply With Quote
  #23   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 03:27 PM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I should add the Tartan 34C, Intrepid inspired design, has only a 10 ft 4 inch
approx. beam which may make it easier to push to weather than a beamier
12 foot plus vessel.
Reply With Quote
  #24   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 03:39 PM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghaegele View Post
I agree that we're underpowered. I set it at my cruising speed, which is just about 2100 RPM. I rebuilt my engine (direct drive also) two years ago and have under 100 hrs on it. Still I don't get much beyond 2200 RMP. (Perhaps its still breaking in?) I have played with the timing and don't think that I'm going to get much more RPM by adjusting it at full-out.
IF you are getting 2200 rpm and the bottom and prop are clean, you are
getting most of what the atomic 4 can produce for horsepower, the other
200 rpm won't change things that much.
Reply With Quote
  #25   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-03-2010, 03:45 PM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
When the going gets really tough, I tend to "tack" upwind, allowing the
sail (if hoisted) to assist the engine rather than take it totally on the nose.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indigo Prop hd78half Drive Train / Propellers 8 08-10-2010 10:20 PM
prop performance baileyem General Interest 3 06-07-2007 09:30 PM
Folding Prop daveinrenton Drive Train / Propellers 1 03-28-2007 02:34 PM
removing prop smosher Drive Train / Propellers 1 06-05-2006 07:39 AM
Prop effect on A4 Performance raleighm Drive Train / Propellers 2 04-29-2005 11:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Universal® is a registered trademark of Westerbeke Corporation

Copyright © 2004-2024 Moyer Marine Inc.

All Rights Reserved