OK, more food for thought. Although I've bought and installed a new (to me) heat exchanger that looks to be doing a good job, in my research I was always intrigued by these plate heat exchangers available in Europe. My exchanger is the traditional "tube" type dual-pass cylinder.
My question is, do you think this could do the job? I'll include the information available with this particular model as well as a photo to get the conversation started.
Number of plates: 20
Dimensions in mm: 191/73/51.8 (without adapters)
Flow max: 4m³/h
Height of adapters: 12mm
Volume: 0.018l/plate = 0.36l
Effective exchanging surface: 0.012m² per plate = 0.24m²
Temperature range: -195°C to 225°C
Operating pressure: 20bar*
Power max: 44kW
Materials: Stainless steel AISI 304
Circuit: F1 - F3 / F4 - F2
Adapters: F1 and F3 1/2" (12.07mm) - F2 and F4 3/4" (19.05mm)
Solder material: 99.9% copper
Weight: 1.04Kg
I am running with an electronic fresh water pump (Johnson). Published maximum flow rates for this pump are at 1.6m³/h (CM30P7-1). That value seems to be OK but I don't know how much water the engine-mounted salt water pump is moving. Otherwise, the ability to exchange heat (power) is an unknown for me when comparing exchangers.
The advantages are obviously 1) weight (!) -my traditional exchanger weighs a ton 2) materials (related to weight) 3) clean flow (the literature mentions less clogging for the plate exchanger due to internal ridges mixing up the flow patterns and 4) price. The model described here goes for about 75 dollars.
My question is, do you think this could do the job? I'll include the information available with this particular model as well as a photo to get the conversation started.
Number of plates: 20
Dimensions in mm: 191/73/51.8 (without adapters)
Flow max: 4m³/h
Height of adapters: 12mm
Volume: 0.018l/plate = 0.36l
Effective exchanging surface: 0.012m² per plate = 0.24m²
Temperature range: -195°C to 225°C
Operating pressure: 20bar*
Power max: 44kW
Materials: Stainless steel AISI 304
Circuit: F1 - F3 / F4 - F2
Adapters: F1 and F3 1/2" (12.07mm) - F2 and F4 3/4" (19.05mm)
Solder material: 99.9% copper
Weight: 1.04Kg
I am running with an electronic fresh water pump (Johnson). Published maximum flow rates for this pump are at 1.6m³/h (CM30P7-1). That value seems to be OK but I don't know how much water the engine-mounted salt water pump is moving. Otherwise, the ability to exchange heat (power) is an unknown for me when comparing exchangers.
The advantages are obviously 1) weight (!) -my traditional exchanger weighs a ton 2) materials (related to weight) 3) clean flow (the literature mentions less clogging for the plate exchanger due to internal ridges mixing up the flow patterns and 4) price. The model described here goes for about 75 dollars.
Comment