Return to the home page...

Go Back   Moyer Marine Atomic 4 Community - Home of the Afourians > Discussion Topics > Electrical

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   IP: 50.29.99.20
Old 12-06-2014, 08:52 AM
Skywalker's Avatar
Skywalker Skywalker is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Stony Brook, NY
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
another coil thread

This has been an interesting couple of days. My interest in the prop has lead me to have a brief discussion with Tom at Indigo. Nice guy, willing to share knowledge and experience. I've learned a lot.

Electronics is my weakest area of knowledge, but obviously, many of you have keen interest in the topic, so here's a question that came from my discussion with Tom.

Why is it a common belief on the Forum that just because a coil reads 4.0 Ohms across the brass studs, 3 Amps of current will flow through that coil when 12 VDC is applied across the stud?

The real answer is that Ohm Law, V=IR, only applies to a pure resistor. A
coil does indeed have resistance but it also has inductance, reluctance, and
impedance which makes Ohms Law not applicable. A very simple means of
proving this is to install a ballast resistor in an ignition system and then
measure the voltage drop across the resistor. You can then use Ohms Law to
determine the amperage. If you perform such a test, you will find that the
current through a coil with about 4 Ohms resistance and a 1 Ohm ballast
resistor with 13.3 VDC applied is only about 1.31 amps. Without the
resistor, the current is about 1.55 amps.

Ok, do what you will!

Chris
Skywalker
Reply With Quote
  #2   IP: 24.152.132.185
Old 12-06-2014, 09:29 AM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
I'm outta here (again!) to work on my daughter's condo over the weekend so my reply will be brief. Three comments:
  1. Inductance, et al applies to the behavior of the coil secondary. Our studies involved only the primary side.
  2. Theories aside, our real world experience applying Ohm's Law to the primary circuit to control coil heat has thus far been 100% successful - and predictable.
  3. Next time you talk with Tom, ask what formula he used in the development of his primary resistor product. In other words, how did he come up with the idea of a primary resistor and how did he determine a one size fits all 1.5Ω resistor was the proper value?
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Reply With Quote
  #3   IP: 108.49.205.7
Old 12-06-2014, 09:47 AM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
Talking

There is such a variety of coils out there it is impossible to have a "one size fits all" solution. Neil and I differ on how to achieve a satisfactory voltage at coil+ but I think we agree that it must be done to protect the coil. The rubber meets the road at coil+: I have a voltmeter dedicated to continuous monitoring at that point. I routinely grasp the coil after long running to make sure it is not overheating.
Reply With Quote
  #4   IP: 128.177.72.199
Old 12-06-2014, 10:24 AM
Administrator's Avatar
Administrator Administrator is offline
MMI Webmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chestertown, MD (Langford Creek)
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 1,335
Thanked 365 Times in 182 Posts
Quote:
Three comments:
Inductance, et al applies to the behavior of the coil secondary. Our studies involved only the primary side.
Theories aside, our real world experience applying Ohm's Law to the primary circuit to control coil heat has thus far been 100% successful - and predictable.
Next time you talk with Tom, ask what formula he used in the development of his primary resistor product. In other words, how did he come up with the idea of a primary resistor and how did he determine a one size fits all 1.5Ω resistor was the proper value?
Yep.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5   IP: 73.55.66.163
Old 12-06-2014, 09:30 PM
romantic comedy's Avatar
romantic comedy romantic comedy is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 13
Thanked 118 Times in 100 Posts
I agree with Neil and Bill.

The primary side of the coil is just many turns of wire.

The linear relationship of E=IR applies. There maybe some changes in resistance and thus current, due to changes in temperature.
Reply With Quote
  #6   IP: 206.205.82.3
Old 12-06-2014, 10:33 PM
edwardc's Avatar
edwardc edwardc is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 2,509
Thanks: 153
Thanked 595 Times in 388 Posts
Wait,wait, you're all right.

The impedance of the coil (sort of tha AC equivilent of resistance) is a function of both the inductance of the coil and the frequency of the non-dc portion of the voltage. When the engine is running, the points (or EI) are putting a square wave voltage onto the coil primary, not a simple DC voltage. Impedance is a complex topic (math pun intended), and we wont go into it here other than to say that the AC current thru the coil is a function of it's impedance. The faster the engine turns, the higher the frequency of the points colsing, and the higher the impedance, resulting in lower current and total energy in the coil. Non-EE mechanics intuitively know this because the shorter dwell time with the points closed at higher RPMs doesn't give the magnetic field as much time to build, so there's less energy stored to make the spark.

When the engine is stopped, however, the points remain closed (or open a smaller percent of the time). If they're open, and you turn on the ignition, no current flows and the coil's in no danger. IF, as is more likely, they're closed, pure DC voltage is applied to the coil, and the only thing limiting the current through the coil is the resistance.
__________________
@(^.^)@ Ed
1977 Pearson P-323 "Dolce Vita"
with rebuilt Atomic-4


Last edited by edwardc; 12-06-2014 at 10:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7   IP: 24.152.132.185
Old 12-07-2014, 08:07 PM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
My position is unless there are some new ignition system failure reports showing a pattern, we've done enough analysis. If anybody else wants to dig into secondary inductance, impedance and reluctance (I'm feeling a twinge of reluctance myself ), to what end or goal I have no idea, go right ahead.

I remembered my very first post on this forum. It was on this same subject. After lurking for a while I saw a pattern of EI conversions followed by engine shut downs, then resuscitated by replacing the old points. I asked if EI is so great, why all the failures and why keep the points plate at the ready?
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others

Last edited by ndutton; 12-07-2014 at 08:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8   IP: 68.60.179.71
Old 12-08-2014, 09:37 AM
marthur's Avatar
marthur marthur is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 831
Thanks: 25
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Impedance is a complex topic (math pun intended)
i imagine that Ed is on to an entirely different phase of humor here : )
__________________
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9   IP: 199.173.224.31
Old 12-08-2014, 10:32 AM
joe_db's Avatar
joe_db joe_db is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,474
Thanks: 49
Thanked 1,026 Times in 721 Posts
For those who love the engineering details:
The ignition circuit is far more complex than DC current flowing through fixed resistance. It takes a fair skill at pretty complex measurements and formulas to accurately model an ignition system. It is possible that two coils with identical DC resistance will have different impedances and different current flows when used in a running engine. The circuilts invovled are very similar to tesla coils or spark gap radio transmitters if you want to do some research.

For those who are tired of getting stuck with burned out coils:
AC, DC, or RF - in all cases adding a resistor reduces total system current and coil heat. I had an Indigo system that had a huge appetite for coils. Now the ballast resistors have become a known fix the coil issue has been fixed. Thomas Edison style science - just try it and see what happens - has shown us that the resistor is the solution.
If anyone really wants to go for the ultimate solution, there are ballast resistors available that change resistance as they get hotter.
Reply With Quote
  #10   IP: 198.11.8.218
Old 12-08-2014, 03:10 PM
BunnyPlanet169's Avatar
BunnyPlanet169 BunnyPlanet169 is offline
Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: York, ME
Posts: 952
Thanks: 25
Thanked 94 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by marthur View Post
i imagine that Ed is on to an entirely different phase of humor here : )
Wow - two, technically three puns in one response! Well Done!!
__________________
Jeff


S/V Bunny Planet
1971 Bristol 29 #169
Reply With Quote
  #11   IP: 12.216.194.200
Old 12-10-2014, 08:08 AM
smosher smosher is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 35 Times in 34 Posts
Here's my cut .

engine rpm = 3600
dist rpm 1/2 of engine 1800

number of cyclinders 4
dwell angle, 40

freq = 3600/2/4/40 = 11.25

reactance coil = 2pifl = 2*3.14*11.25*.008 = .56

I found some coils listed as 8 mh, so I used that

impedance coil = sq rt R^2 + reactance^2 = 4 ohm coil *4 +.56*.56 = 4.03

Total impedance = ballast resistor 1 ohm + coil impedance 4.03 = 5.03

you can substitute Impedance for resistance in ohms law in calc amps.

Not sure how you came up with your readings, what kind of meter and did you
have it set to ac or dc. As your readings do not compute.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #12   IP: 63.143.240.109
Old 12-11-2014, 08:31 AM
Skywalker's Avatar
Skywalker Skywalker is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Stony Brook, NY
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
I've been trying to catch up with things, so I'm a little late in putting up this clarification from Tom. Here it goes.

First I must correct a typo I made in the previous comments posted by
SKYWALKER. The ballast resistor specified should be 1.5Ω. Additionally,
I performed some additional bench testing today to update some specific
data points before I shared the information with the world wide web.

The idea of a primary resistor came about as a result of several Indigo
coil failures even though the coil resistance as measured across the
primary studs was on the order of 4.0 Ω. The coils were running very hot
in service, about 200F, and it was realized that this was too hot and lead
to damaging thermal expansion within the coil. Various threads on the MMI
Forum confirmed my suspicions and convinced me that I should look into a
Primary Ballast Resistor as a means of promoting reliability and extending
coil life for the Indigo system.

I basically conducted considerable bench testing with an operational
Indigo EI and coil and various high wattage resistors in an effort to
reduce the current through the coil (thus reducing its operating
temperature) yet keep the voltage level at the coil sufficiently high to
keep the A4 running properly. It has never been my intent to develop or
promote my solution for the Indigo system as a "one size fits all"
solution. I did, however, through my test program, find that a 1.5Ω
ballast resistor will reduce the operating temperature of the Indigo coil
from about 200F down to about 165F while keeping the voltage to the coil
above 10 Volts. At a battery system voltage of about 12V, it was found
that the current through the coil and ballast resistor (voltage drop across
it of 2.2V) was 1.46A and the voltage across the coil was right at 10V. At
the high end of normal battery system voltage, 13.8V, it was found that the
current through the coil and ballast resistor (voltage drop across it of
2.5V) was 1.66A and the voltage across the coil was right at 11.4 V. For
the purpose of determining the current in the above data points, Ohm's Law,
V=IR, can be used relative to the voltage drop across the ballast resistor.
For example, 2.5V = I x 1.5Ω, therefore I = 1.66A.

I was satisfied that the 1.5Ω ballast resistor was and is a proper
solution for most "normal" A4 electrical systems with the Indigo EI and
coil. For those who may choose to run their system voltage at a level
greater than 13.8V or those who want to "dial in" a specific voltage
across their coil, then a 1.5Ω ballast resistor may not be the right
choice. Likewise, any coil other than the coil supplied by Indigo, which
by the way is a product of Andover Coils here is in the USA, may or may
not respond properly to a 1.5Ω ballast resistor.

Probably the easiest approach for an unknown coil would be to install a
ballast resistor of known value, measure the voltage drop across it with
the A4 running, and then determine the voltage across the coil [(System
Voltage) - (Voltage drop across ballast resistor)]. If the Voltage across
the coil comes out in the 10.5V to 11.8V range, you should be good to go
from a coil heating standpoint and yet have a sufficient voltage for
sparkplug firing. Note it is important that the ballast resistor be rated
about 50 Watts continuous to insure that it will hold up under the stress
of the application.

I hope this somewhat clarifies the mystic of coils and ballast resistors a
little.
Reply With Quote
  #13   IP: 128.177.81.23
Old 12-11-2014, 11:24 AM
Administrator's Avatar
Administrator Administrator is offline
MMI Webmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chestertown, MD (Langford Creek)
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 1,335
Thanked 365 Times in 182 Posts
Success has many fathers, as they say.

Forum members will remember Neil's original work on the subject, even if not mentioned in the comments quoted in your post.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #14   IP: 184.1.14.64
Old 12-11-2014, 07:40 PM
roadnsky's Avatar
roadnsky roadnsky is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Mead, NV
Posts: 3,104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 467 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
...Forum members will remember Neil's original work on the subject, even if not mentioned in the comments quoted in your post.
Without giving away too much private info...

I can say that not many on the forum know how much work and organization Neil put into helping us figure out the EI/Coil snafu.
This was an ongoing issue with our A4 community for YEARS until he figured it out.
It is now a NON-issue.
Obviously he has contributed in many, many other areas for our A4's.
Thank you Neil.


'nuff said.
__________________
-Jerry

'Lone Ranger'

1978 RANGER 30
Reply With Quote
  #15   IP: 24.152.132.185
Old 12-11-2014, 08:28 PM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
Thanks guys, you're a class act.
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others

Last edited by ndutton; 12-11-2014 at 08:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16   IP: 67.232.87.32
Old 12-11-2014, 08:56 PM
Marian Claire's Avatar
Marian Claire Marian Claire is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,797
Thanks: 33
Thanked 129 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadnsky View Post
Without giving away too much private info...

I can say that not many on the forum know how much work and organization Neil put into helping us figure out the EI/Coil snafu.
This was an ongoing issue with our A4 community for YEARS until he figured it out.
It is now a NON-issue.
Obviously he has contributed in many, many other areas for our A4's.
Thank you Neil.


'nuff said.

+1
Dan S/V Marian Claire
Reply With Quote
  #17   IP: 50.29.99.78
Old 12-12-2014, 07:59 AM
Skywalker's Avatar
Skywalker Skywalker is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Stony Brook, NY
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
This thread proves once again how lucky we are to have this forum.

I'm not sure what I stepped in, but it is clear to me that this topic was handled with honesty, class, and rationality.

So much of discourse these days seems to degenerate into cliches and name calling. This is a discussion of ideas, research, supported by outcomes. Very cool.

Skywalker
Reply With Quote
  #18   IP: 72.45.14.161
Old 12-12-2014, 09:15 AM
joe_db's Avatar
joe_db joe_db is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,474
Thanks: 49
Thanked 1,026 Times in 721 Posts
It was really a fantastic effort. TWO product lines had random failure issue because of a lack of understanding of slow speed* engines that could spend all day at what would be 20 MPH for a car. Both are now reliable additions to the A4.


* EI systems increase dwell, which means a hotter spark and much better output at high RPMs. At low RPMs the "on time" increases enough to overheat the coils absent the ballast resistor.

Last edited by joe_db; 12-12-2014 at 09:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19   IP: 24.152.132.185
Old 12-12-2014, 09:38 AM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_db View Post
At low RPMs the "on time" increases enough to overheat the coils absent the ballast resistor.
Minor correction: replace "the ballast resistor" with "sufficient resistance."

Case in point: MMI's coil is designed and manufactured to meet our resistance requirements WITHOUT the need for a supplemental resistor. It is not an off the shelf coil. It is manufactured to Don's specification.

Pretty incredible if you ask me.
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Reply With Quote
  #20   IP: 161.213.49.150
Old 12-12-2014, 10:51 AM
JOHN COOKSON JOHN COOKSON is offline
Afourian MVP, Professor Emeritus
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,500
Thanks: 54
Thanked 855 Times in 629 Posts
Another +1

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadnsky View Post
Obviously he has contributed in many, many other areas for our A4's.
Thank you Neil. 'nuff said.
Neil is the go to guy around here.

TRUE GRIT
Reply With Quote
  #21   IP: 24.152.132.185
Old 12-12-2014, 12:09 PM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
[off topic]
Thanks again guys. I'm only one of many on the MMI forum. I've said it before, I wasn't alone in the EI/coil work. Had PLENTY of help.

Funny how forums are. I'm hated on another, particularly by the moderation. They demonize dissenting opinions over there. I've been treated rudely, called names and had posts arbitrarily deleted (I promise they were not offensive but merely disagreed with the mod's opinion). I even had a San Francisco law firm contact me as a result of my unwelcome posts in a thread regarding asbestos in boatbuilding. They were considering using me as an expert witness in a case.

Yep, this forum is GREAT! If you want to toss about compliments, consider our host and administrator/moderator.

OK, back to your regularly scheduled programming. Something about inductance, impedance and reluctance wasn't it?
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others

Last edited by ndutton; 12-12-2014 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coil overheating robshepherd Ignition System 29 07-17-2013 08:41 AM
Coil Failure dvd Electrical 14 10-25-2011 05:35 PM
Hot Coil and High Alternator Output Triton106 Electrical 53 10-02-2011 07:12 PM
engine stops Possum Troubleshooting 4 04-20-2011 09:19 AM
Hi, new member with a problem cpdeeley Introductions 10 01-11-2009 01:43 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Universal® is a registered trademark of Westerbeke Corporation

Copyright © 2004-2024 Moyer Marine Inc.

All Rights Reserved