Return to the home page...

Go Back   Moyer Marine Atomic 4 Community - Home of the Afourians > Owner Discussion Groups > Discussion Groups > Pearson

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   IP: 75.164.155.62
Old 11-11-2010, 12:40 AM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pearson 35 Upgrading to 2 to 1 reduction

Hey folks,
I have a P35 with the A4 and it's beginning to show it's age a little. I've given a lot of thought to re-powering with the Beta 28 but the price tag is around 9K with me doing all the work.

As I begin to run the prop calculators, I'm finding out an A4 with a 2:1 gear reduction puts out about the same HP and close to the same torque as the Beta 28. Rebuilding the A4 and adding a 2:1 gear reduction (doing the work mostly myself) is about 1/3 the cost of the Beta 28 option.

The questions I have are:
1. Will the 2:1 reduction unit fit the P35's limited engine compartment without reworking cabinets (IE needing to slide the engine forward because of the added six inches from the reduction unit), or can I use the existing A4 mounting holes and shorten the prop shaft? Note, this is why I gave up on the Universal M35B (Gallery Marine is running a special on them for $7387).
2. I have the 7/8 prop shaft and the A4 diagrams specify reduction units using 1 or 1 1/8 bore/key ways. Do I need a new shaft log, just a "thinner" cutlass bearing, or adapt the bore / key way and keep the 7/8 shaft? After all it maybe six inches shorter!
3. Finally, from all you 2:1 folks out there, is the upgrade to the 2:1 reduction gear really worth it?

Thanks,

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #2   IP: 72.66.35.238
Old 11-11-2010, 08:15 AM
High Hopes's Avatar
High Hopes High Hopes is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wow, similar thoughts to mine. I have thought at length about the 2:1 gear box and every time I come up with the same questions as you. My conclusion along the lines of that old adage, "In for a penny, in for a pound." Changing the shaft is the kicker.

I do not know why a prop solution is not available that will let the A4 rev at 2700 or so. Maybe all prop makers just think diesels (1800 rpm) and can't get out of that box. But for whatever reason, we are stuck with operating the A4 at lower speeds.

If I ever re-power, I will go electric. The cost is about $3000 for the kit and $1000 for a battery. The gearing can be easily changed to accommodate any prop pitch. I could sell my A4 for $5000? That leaves another $1000 for an emergency portable generator. That would also keep the mistress cool with the AC.

Here is a link.

http://www.boatdesign.net/Directory/...sion/Electric/

Good luck with your decision Jeff.

Steve

ps You will probably want to leave your existing shaft alone. The change in diameter would be done where the engine drive shaft flange and the prop shaft flange meet. Probably some custom machining, but I haven't explored that part much.

Last edited by High Hopes; 11-11-2010 at 08:22 AM. Reason: Added PS
Reply With Quote
  #3   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-11-2010, 08:59 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
The Indigo propeller on a straight drive A4 will allow 2400 rpm max.
Maybe you could get by with that. Also, maybe speaking to Tom
Stevens of Indigo, he may be able to offer additional suggestions.

Regards Art
Reply With Quote
  #4   IP: 71.168.64.77
Old 11-11-2010, 09:02 AM
ArtJ ArtJ is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 221
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
I have a straight drive A 4 in my Tartan 34C which is 34.5 feet and 11500
lbs. The Indigo prop allows for 6.6 knots in calm seas and a good 5 knots
or better in fairly tough seas.
Reply With Quote
  #5   IP: 173.166.26.241
Old 11-11-2010, 09:11 AM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
Thumbs up

Jeff - Your interest in the 2:1 is right on target for those of us with bigger/heavier hulls. I did the change over to reduction on my boat and it has made a world of difference. I can now plow my way thru tides just about anywhere I go. Best modification I ever made on Destiny and I have made a few (see my albums). It is easy to switch cutless bearings; step up to 1". Since you will have to get shaft work done anyway this is a good time to just get a new one. The marginal cost will be small. Raising the engine about 1" is easy. Just make sure you have the extra room aft to extend the engine assembly. If you do proceed I can supply exact measurements and photos to help. Just do it. Regards, Hanley
Reply With Quote
  #6   IP: 75.164.155.62
Old 11-11-2010, 01:25 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks folks,
For the Replies. I need to add some additional information to make the picture clearer.

First, I changed the existing prop to 11 x 5 RH. This allowed the A4 to reach 2450 rpm. There are prop solutions to allow the A4 to reach 2700 rpm, however props become very inefficient at those speeds. I also looked into electric motors however I would need at least a 10 kw motor. Can't load enough batteries in the boat to provide a decent reserve.

Second, the Pearson 35 is 13,500 and including 90 gal of water, our scuba gear the, and other items the boat displaces at least 15,000 or more.

Based upon weight, I would need the Universal M35B, but its simply too big for the P35 engine compartment - if I want access to the stuffing box!

Hanley, I would be very interested in your experience installing the 2:1 reduction gearbox, especially pictures.

Finally any folks out there who own P35's who have done this upgrade? How well did it fit?

Thanks,

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #7   IP: 173.166.26.241
Old 11-11-2010, 02:52 PM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
Talking

Jeff - In putting on the 11x5 you did the only viable move available to you. You brought the rpms to where the engine wanted to be; and it is now happy. The down side is that you don't have enough prop to move the boat in conditions you are likely to encounter. In light of the additional details you provided I'm surprised your boat wasn't equipped with 2:1 on delivery. I will take a picture of my installation and post it on this thread shortly. Could you post a picture of your present set up? Regards, Hanley
Reply With Quote
  #8   IP: 75.164.155.62
Old 11-11-2010, 11:30 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Posting a Picture...

Hanley,
The P35 is located in Anacortes WA, I'm in Portland OR. It will be about a three to four weeks before I travel back up to Anacortes. I'll be sure to get pictures then and post them here.

BTW, I scoured the pearson35.com website and the related discussion board site (http://hhickman.proboards.com) and found a person who had the 2:1 reduction unit installed on his P35, however in 2005 he re-powered with the Beta 28.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #9   IP: 76.254.134.47
Old 11-12-2010, 03:59 PM
dvd's Avatar
dvd dvd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Joaquin Delta, California
Posts: 449
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Jeff,

I have a cal 3-30- with a 2 to 1 and my 30 footer is of course a much smaller boat. I think the only difference will be that the shaft will need to be cut down as the 2 to 1 may take up more room. Mine doesn't really look much different than the direct but i have never really paid that much attention.

dvd
Reply With Quote
  #10   IP: 75.164.155.62
Old 11-14-2010, 05:02 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
update on reduction gear install...

Greetings folks,
Well I found a used reduction gear. It came with the reversing gear and aft housing (early model). Also picked up a used starter for a spare.

I've been re-evaluating the situation. I not going to overhaul the engine unless the compression is low enough to warrant that step. Why spend the money unless I need to.

I'll think my next steps will be:

1. check compression to determine need for engine rebuild.
2. I'll remove engine from boat bring back to Portland.
3. I'm assuming a rebuild will not be needed - hopefully!
4. Remove head, clean out cooling passages, clean, prime, and paint.
5. Install thermostat conversion kit.
6. Remove block water jacket plate and clean out cooling passages. Note engine was ordered new with fresh water cooling so inside should be pretty clean.
7. Install cooling system bypass.
8. Install MMI flange pump.
9. Install improved oil passage-way modified accessory drive.
10. Check valves. Install upgraded valve springs.
11. Clean out oil pump screen. Oil pressure is good so (maybe) I'll skip the new oil pump gears (any input on this step fella's).
12. Install the improved brace pin.
13. Install a 1/2 inch pulley for the 75 amp alternator (if the new balmar supports the 1/2 belt).
14. Drill and install the access port for easy change of the break band adjusting bolt.
15. Install the 2:1 reduction unit.
16. Clean, Prime, and paint the block and manifold.
17. Reinstall back in the boat.

Can you fella's think of anything else???

Of course, if I need to do rings and so forth (due to low compression), I'll be into a full rebuild.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #11   IP: 24.152.131.220
Old 11-14-2010, 05:07 PM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
18. Submit picture for Moyer Marine pinup of the month!
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Reply With Quote
  #12   IP: 75.164.155.75
Old 02-02-2011, 10:46 AM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Update

Well folks,
After a bout with pneumonia over the winter, I'm in the process of pulling the engine. I took compression numbers and here is what I have:

Cyl# Dry Wet
1 - 112 - 140
2 - 120 - 140
3 - 120 - 140
4 - 102 - 120

Wet reading is after squirting 1/2 oz of MMO into the spark plug hole. What do you folks think about the lower reading on number 4?

Jeff

PS Pictures will follow....
Reply With Quote
  #13   IP: 173.166.26.241
Old 02-02-2011, 11:04 AM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
I am more concerned about the high numbers on the other three. Your numbers suggest a build up in the combustion chambers resulting in elevated compression. Consider taking the head off for a cleaning of head and tops pf pistons.
Reply With Quote
  #14   IP: 72.254.58.49
Old 02-02-2011, 01:25 PM
roadnsky's Avatar
roadnsky roadnsky is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Mead, NV
Posts: 3,104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 467 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanleyclifford View Post
I am more concerned about the high numbers on the other three. Your numbers suggest a build up in the combustion chambers resulting in elevated compression. Consider taking the head off for a cleaning of head and tops pf pistons.
Hmmmm, Hanley.
You've got me wondering about my numbers.
I've got 122/120/120/118 (1-4)
They've been that way since I took my first readings two years ago.
The engine runs fine.
__________________
-Jerry

'Lone Ranger'

1978 RANGER 30
Reply With Quote
  #15   IP: 173.166.26.241
Old 02-02-2011, 01:58 PM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
The specification is 90 - 125 psi. You're still in the bracket, Bro.
Reply With Quote
  #16   IP: 71.20.52.65
Old 02-02-2011, 02:22 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As promised pictures...


The engine compartment at the beginning - NOTICE THE CAN of PB in lower right corner!!!



This is an example of the wire mess to clean up



I have enough room - barley for the 2:1 unit and flex coupler. Maybe a good time to convert to a drip-less seal

Last edited by jeffgerritsen; 02-02-2011 at 02:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17   IP: 72.254.58.49
Old 02-02-2011, 02:28 PM
roadnsky's Avatar
roadnsky roadnsky is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Mead, NV
Posts: 3,104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 467 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hanleyclifford View Post
The specification is 90 - 125 psi. You're still in the bracket, Bro.
Whew! Had me worrying about the higher numbers...
__________________
-Jerry

'Lone Ranger'

1978 RANGER 30
Reply With Quote
  #18   IP: 75.192.109.53
Old 02-02-2011, 02:51 PM
Administrator's Avatar
Administrator Administrator is offline
MMI Webmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chestertown, MD (Langford Creek)
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 1,335
Thanked 365 Times in 182 Posts
Is this "sanitation hose"? Even if yes, does this make a difference?

Bill
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #19   IP: 24.152.131.220
Old 02-02-2011, 03:38 PM
ndutton's Avatar
ndutton ndutton is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,619
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,425 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
Is this "sanitation hose"? Even if yes, does this make a difference?
Heavens YES!
Not for use below the waterline.
__________________
Neil
1977 Catalina 30
San Pedro, California
prior boats 1987 Westsail 32, 1970 Catalina 22
Had my hands in a few others
Reply With Quote
  #20   IP: 24.224.206.117
Old 02-02-2011, 04:38 PM
Mo's Avatar
Mo Mo is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Halifax NS,
Posts: 4,470
Thanks: 292
Thanked 411 Times in 272 Posts
Thumbs up Double Clamps

I would change the hose but I note the double clamps. All hoses coming off thru-hulls should be double clamped. Something to look at on our boats and double up if not already done.

When I bought my boat all were single. I replaced thru hulls, hoses and put on double T-Bolt SS clamps.

I live in Halifax NS and there is a Industrial Business Park about 15 minute drive from the house. Goodyear Rubber has an outlet there and reinforced hose for any application can be had...including exhaust. I find it much less expensive than going to a Marine Store and they also have the Heavy Duty SS clamps at reasonable prices.
__________________
Mo

"Odyssey"
1976 C&C 30 MKI

The pessimist complains about the wind.
The optimist expects it to change.
The realist adjusts the sails.
...Sir William Arthur Ward.
Reply With Quote
  #21   IP: 71.90.49.130
Old 02-02-2011, 05:53 PM
Laker Laker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sheboygan wis.
Posts: 454
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Sky -

I think those compression numbers are outstanding. Nicely consistent.

Laker
__________________
1966 Columbia 34 SABINA
Reply With Quote
  #22   IP: 72.254.58.49
Old 02-02-2011, 05:57 PM
roadnsky's Avatar
roadnsky roadnsky is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Mead, NV
Posts: 3,104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 467 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laker View Post
Sky -

I think those compression numbers are outstanding. Nicely consistent.
Gee... Thanks!
__________________
-Jerry

'Lone Ranger'

1978 RANGER 30
Reply With Quote
  #23   IP: 71.20.52.65
Old 02-02-2011, 06:16 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bill,
It's not sanitation hose - it's a super heavy duty water supply hose used for floating homes. It's clear so one can see the water line, and bursting psi is about 160. A real PIA to work with. The white band is a re-enforcing band moulded into the hose for the PSI rating. The hose is smooth on inside and outside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
Is this "sanitation hose"? Even if yes, does this make a difference?

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #24   IP: 71.20.52.65
Old 02-02-2011, 06:18 PM
jeffgerritsen's Avatar
jeffgerritsen jeffgerritsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hanley,
Are you refering to me or to roadnsky?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hanleyclifford View Post
The specification is 90 - 125 psi. You're still in the bracket, Bro.
Reply With Quote
  #25   IP: 173.9.105.253
Old 02-02-2011, 09:49 PM
hanleyclifford's Avatar
hanleyclifford hanleyclifford is offline
Afourian MVP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,978
Thanks: 172
Thanked 280 Times in 226 Posts
Jeff - Your wet figures for 1,2, and 3 - 140 psi are high. Too much compression.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RH prop with 2:1 reduction gear RogerW Drive Train / Propellers 4 11-11-2011 04:29 PM
Reduction Gear Removal AustinPowered Overhaul 8 09-06-2010 12:54 PM
Replacing gaskets on reversing gear and reduction gear housings phorvati Troubleshooting 1 10-06-2008 02:10 PM
Changing From Reduction to No Reduction wclanin Reversing Gear 7 05-07-2007 07:36 AM
Converting from 2:1 reduction Phil General Maintenance 6 04-09-2007 04:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Universal® is a registered trademark of Westerbeke Corporation

Copyright © 2004-2024 Moyer Marine Inc.

All Rights Reserved